Much will be written in coming days about the just-concluded trilogy bout between Manny Pacquiao and Juan Manuel Marquez in which Pacquiao escaped with a split decision, prompting Marquez and his trainer Nacho Berestain to once again claim they’ve been robbed.   Having just conducted an exhausting review of the first two fights (see PM1 Analysis and PM2 Analysis), I would agree that in the prior fights there was room for them to make such a case because, in large part, the punchstats in those fights favored Marquez.  He led Pacquiao in overall punches and power punches in both fights.   I actually had Pacquaio winning PM1 by 1 point, and losing PM2 by 1 point.  So I’m not coming from a place of partisan blindness.  But here’s the thing — I’ve been looking at the stats for the just concluded PM3, which no one has had a chance to digest yet,  and comparing them to PM1 and PM2.  These stats don’ t lie, and they favor Manny Pacquiao, decisively.

Pacquiao’s punchstats reveal a clear victory

Compubox punchstats are not everything–there are times when outcomes don’t track with them. But that’s rare, and the realizty is that in the absence of knockdowns, punchstats generally correlate over 97% with scoring, meaning 97% of the time the judges and compubox are in agreement in any round where there is no knockdown.  In any given round, the fighter who lands more punches, (particularly when he also land more power punches in addition to overall punches) almost always win the round.

One of the key reasons Marquez had a beef in the first two fights was that in each of those fights, Marquez’ punch output both in terms of overall punches landed and power punches landed exceeded Pacquiao’s making it clear that in those fights,  the logic for Pacquiao victories had to be tied to the 4 knockdowns he achieved.  Marquez could make a clear case that in terms of basic boxing stats, he outboxed Pacquiao.  But not so in this fight. Marquez did not win the “battle of compubox” —  Pacquiao was comfortably ahead in terms of overall punches landed and power punches landed, in the process reversing the trends of the first two fights:


  • Pacquiao Overall Punches Landed in PM1/PM2/PM3: 148/157/176 (up 19 in the last fight)
  • Marquez Overall Punches Landed in PM/PM2/PM3:  158/172/138 (down 34 in the last fight)

Here it is in Punch differential

  • Pacquiao Overal Punch Differential PM1/PM2/PM3: -10/-15/+38

That’s pretty dramatic.

Now consider Power Punches

  • Pacquiao Power Punches Landed in PM1/PM2/PM3: 100/113/117 (up 4 in the last fight)
  • Marquez Power Punches Landed in PM/PM2/PM3:  122/130/100 (down 30 in the last fight)
  • Pacquiao Power Punch Differential: -22/-17/+17

Here is the actual Compubox “Final Punchstats” report made available just after the fight: (click to enlarge)

Folks, I would submit that these stats tell the tale.  Previously Pacquiao had to rely on his knockdowns to offset his disadvantage in punchstats.  Indeed, prior to the fight tonight HBO made a big point of pointing out that Maquez had won 57% of the rounds to date on the judges’ scorecards which is consistent with his punchstat advantage.  Minus the knockdowns, he wins at least one of the fights, and possibly two.  But here’s the catch:  if Marquez wants to rely on punchstats to claim he won the first fight, then he must live by punchstats and acknowledge this time it was different — this time the stats are against him and he lost a close fight fair and square.  Pacquiao outpunched Marquez in PMIII and did not have to rely on knockdowns to demonstrate his superiority. Marquez claim that he was robbed is meritless.

UPDATE:  See Round by Round Judges Cards and Round by Round Compubox Cards

Berestain, Hall of Fame Trainer that he is, was a fool tonight…..

Knowing what had happened in the first two fights when going to judge’s scorecards, and knowing (as he should have) that his fighter was lagging behind in punch differential and powershot differential after having led in those categories previously — how could he be telling his boxer coming down the stretch “You’re winning”, inviting him to coast all the way home?  That was pure tomfoolery.  Pacquiao is the champ and, as Emmanuel Steward put it, you have to take the crown from the champ.  You must win decisively.   For Berestain to tell Marquez he was winning was criminally negligent.  If Marquez had approached the championship rounds with the kind of urgency they demanded, he might have won.

Mayweather-Pacquiao may now finally happen

At last, Manny Pacquiao looks human.  “Dinomita” Marquez is “Kryptonita” to Pacquiao.  By looking less than overwhelming against an opponent that Mayweather had handled in superior fashion to Manny, it may be that Pacquiao has finally made the only move that could get him a date with Mayweather.  Maybe Mayweather will now at last feel he can beat Pacquiao — that’s what has been holding him back.  If he feels that, now is the time for the fight to be made.  May 5, 2012 — my prediction is it will happen and the closeness of this fight is a direct contributing factor.

Was this a satisfying victory for Pacquiao or his fans?


Was it a victory?




One Response to Pacquiao's Win Over Marquez Shouldn't be Controversial; the stats don't lie (and anyway, maybe Mayweather will finally fight Pacquiao now)

  1. Talk me Up! says:

    Talk Me Up is an app designed to give you on demand motivation at the tap of a button – for free! Record and listen to encouraging voice messages to help each other succeed in daily life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Visit our friends!

A few highly recommended friends...

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.